Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

SPS: Steering Probability Squeezing for Better Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models

About

Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training reasoning-oriented models by leveraging rule-based reward signals. However, RL training typically tends to improve single-sample success rates (i.e., Pass@1) while offering limited exploration of diverse reasoning trajectories, which is crucial for multi-sample performance (i.e., Pass@k). Our preliminary analysis reveals that this limitation stems from a fundamental squeezing effect, whereby probability mass is excessively concentrated on a narrow subset of high-reward trajectories, restricting genuine exploration and constraining attainable performance under RL training. To address this issue, in this work, we propose Steering Probability Squeezing (SPS), a training paradigm that interleaves conventional RL with inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). SPS treats on-policy rollouts as demonstrations and employs IRL to explicitly reshape the induced trajectory distribution, thereby enhancing exploration without introducing external supervision. Experiments on five commonly used reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SPS can enable better exploration and improve Pass@k. Beyond algorithmic contributions, we provide an analysis of RL learning dynamics and identify an empirical upper bound on Pass@k, shedding light on intrinsic exploration limits in RL-based reasoning models. Our findings suggest that alternating between RL and IRL offers an effective pathway toward extending the exploration capacity of reasoning-oriented large language models.

Yifu Huo, Chenglong Wang, Ziming Zhu, Shunjie Xing, Peinan Feng, Tongran Liu, Qiaozhi He, Tianhua Zhou, Xiaojia Chang, Jingbo Zhu, Zhengtao Yu, Tong Xiao• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Accuracy (Acc)84.25
543
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Accuracy80
479
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Accuracy46.67
311
Scientific ReasoningGPQA Diamond
Accuracy29.8
62
Mathematical ReasoningBRUMO (DEF.)
Pass@12866.67
30
Mathematical ReasoningHMMT (FEB.)
Pass@12836.67
30
Mathematical ReasoningHMMT Nov
Pass@12843.33
30
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 25 2025
Pass@12853.33
30
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Pass@12870
30
Mathematical ReasoningHMMT February
Mean@64 Acc0.4667
24
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update