Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

How Do Answer Tokens Read Reasoning Traces? Self-Reading Patterns in Thinking LLMs for Quantitative Reasoning

About

Thinking LLMs produce reasoning traces before answering. Prior activation steering work mainly targets on shaping these traces. It remains less understood how answer tokens actually read and integrate the reasoning to produce reliable outcomes. Focusing on quantitative reasoning, we analyze the answer-to-reasoning attention and observe a benign self-reading pattern aligned with correctness, characterized by a forward drift of the reading focus along the reasoning trace and a persistent concentration on key semantic anchors, whereas incorrect solutions exhibit diffuse and irregular attention pattern. We interpret this as internal certainty during answer decoding, where the model commits to a viable solution branch and integrates key evidence. Following this, we propose a training-free steering method driven by Self-Reading Quality (SRQ) scores combining geometric metrics for process control with semantic metrics for content monitoring. SRQ selects data to build steering vectors that guide inference toward benign self-reading and away from uncertain and disorganized reading. Experiments show that our method yields consistent accuracy gains.

Haoyang Chen, Yi Liu, Jianzhi Shao, Tao Zhang, Chengfu Huo, Wei Hu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K
Accuracy93.3
388
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Accuracy95.6
221
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 24/25
Accuracy80
171
Math ReasoningSVAMP
Accuracy96.5
85
Scientific ReasoningSciQ
Accuracy94.6
25
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Follow for update