Sink-Token-Aware Pruning for Fine-Grained Video Understanding in Efficient Video LLMs
About
Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs) incur high inference latency due to a large number of visual tokens provided to LLMs. To address this, training-free visual token pruning has emerged as a solution to reduce computational costs; however, existing methods are primarily validated on Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) benchmarks, where coarse-grained cues often suffice. In this work, we reveal that these methods suffer a sharp performance collapse on fine-grained understanding tasks requiring precise visual grounding, such as hallucination evaluation. To explore this gap, we conduct a systematic analysis and identify sink tokens--semantically uninformative tokens that attract excessive attention--as a key obstacle to fine-grained video understanding. When these sink tokens survive pruning, they distort the model's visual evidence and hinder fine-grained understanding. Motivated by these insights, we propose Sink-Token-aware Pruning (SToP), a simple yet effective plug-and-play method that introduces a sink score to quantify each token's tendency to behave as a sink and applies this score to existing spatial and temporal pruning methods to suppress them, thereby enhancing video understanding. To validate the effectiveness of SToP, we apply it to state-of-the-art pruning methods (VisionZip, FastVid, and Holitom) and evaluate it across diverse benchmarks covering hallucination, open-ended generation, compositional reasoning, and MCQA. Our results demonstrate that SToP significantly boosts performance, even when pruning up to 90% of visual tokens.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fine-grained Video Understanding | EventHallusion | Binary Accuracy64.06 | 22 | |
| Fine-grained Video Understanding | VideoComp | Action Accuracy71.04 | 22 | |
| Fine-grained Video Understanding | VCG Bench | Consistency Score3.23 | 22 | |
| Video Question Answering | VideoMME | Accuracy (Short Length)67.89 | 19 | |
| Multiple-choice Question Answering | NextQA | Accuracy80.38 | 15 | |
| Multiple-choice Question Answering | LongVideoBench | Accuracy55.12 | 15 | |
| Multiple-choice Question Answering | MVBench | Accuracy57.84 | 15 | |
| Multiple-choice Question Answering | MLVU | Accuracy63.75 | 15 |