Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

PivotMerge: Bridging Heterogeneous Multimodal Pre-training via Post-Alignment Model Merging

About

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) rely on multimodal pre-training over diverse data sources, where different datasets often induce complementary cross-modal alignment capabilities. Model merging provides a cost-effective mechanism for integrating multiple expert MLLMs with complementary strengths into a unified model. However, existing model merging research mainly focuses on post-finetuning scenarios, leaving the pre-training stage largely unexplored. We argue that the core of MLLM pre-training lies in establishing effective cross-modal alignment, which bridges visual and textual representations into a unified semantic space. Motivated by this insight, we introduce the post-alignment merging task, which aims to integrate cross-modal alignment capabilities learned from heterogeneous multimodal pre-training. This setting introduces two key challenges: cross-domain parameter interference, where parameter updates learned from different data distributions conflict during merging, and layer-wise alignment contribution disparity, where different layers and projectors contribute unevenly to cross-modal alignment. To address them, we propose \textbf{PivotMerge}, a post-alignment merging framework for cross-modal projectors. PivotMerge incorporates two key components: Shared-space Decomposition and Filtering, which disentangles shared alignment patterns from domain-specific variations and suppresses conflicting directions, and Alignment-guided Layer-wise Merging, which assigns layer-specific merging weights based on differing alignment contributions. We construct systematic CC12M-based post-alignment merging scenarios for evaluation. Extensive experiments on multiple multimodal benchmarks show that PivotMerge consistently outperforms existing baselines, demonstrating its effectiveness and generalization ability.

Zibo Shao, Baochen Xiong, Xiaoshan Yang, Yaguang Song, Qimeng Zhang, Haifeng Chen, Changsheng Xu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE (test)--
107
Multi-modal ReasoningMMVet (test)
Accuracy27.8
49
Multi-modal Question AnsweringMMStar (test)
Accuracy27.5
17
Multimodal PerceptionMME-P (test)
MME-P Score1.11e+3
13
Multimodal QAMMBench EN (test)
MMBenchEN Score32
13
Multimodal QASEEDBench (test)
SEEDBench Score33.7
13
Multimodal QALLaVABench (test)
LLaVABench Score48
13
Multimodal Understanding and ReasoningMultimodal Evaluation Suite (MMVet, MMBench_EN, SEED-Bench, LLaVABench, POPE, MME-P, MMVP, MMStar) (Random Sampling Splits of CC12M)
MMVet Score30.1
13
Visual PerceptionMMVP (test)
MMVP Score34.3
13
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update