SketchVLM: Vision language models can annotate images to explain thoughts and guide users
About
When answering questions about images, humans naturally point, label, and draw to explain their reasoning. In contrast, modern vision-language models (VLMs) such as Gemini-3-Pro and GPT-5 only respond with text, which can be difficult for users to verify. We present SketchVLM, a training-free, model-agnostic framework that enables VLMs to produce non-destructive, editable SVG overlays on the input image to visually explain their answers. Across seven benchmarks spanning visual reasoning (maze navigation, ball-drop trajectory prediction, and object counting) and drawing (part labeling, connecting-the-dots, and drawing shapes around objects), SketchVLM improves visual reasoning task accuracy by up to +28.5 percentage points and annotation quality by up to 1.48x relative to image-editing and fine-tuned sketching baselines, while also producing annotations that are more faithful to the model's stated answer. We find that single-turn generation already achieves strong accuracy and annotation quality, and multi-turn generation opens up further opportunities for human-AI collaboration. An interactive demo and code are at https://sketchvlm.github.io/.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counting | Counting | Accuracy95.9 | 7 | |
| Annotation Quality | VPCT Ball Drop and Maze Navigation | VPCT Score3.12 | 5 | |
| Annotation-text Alignment | VPCT Ball Drop Maze Navigation | VPCT Score100 | 5 | |
| Ball Drop | Ball Drop | Human Score3.79 | 5 | |
| Drawing Quality Assessment | SketchVLM Drawing Task Suite VPCT, Ball Drop, Maze, Counting | VPCT Score3.12 | 5 | |
| Maze Navigation | Maze Navigation (Invalid) | Human Score4.13 | 5 | |
| Maze Navigation | Maze Navigation (val) | Human Score4.45 | 5 | |
| Visual Reasoning | VPCT Ball Drop Maze and Counting | VPCT Accuracy96 | 5 | |
| VPCT | VPCT | Human Score4.56 | 5 |