Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

SeaEvo: Advancing Algorithm Discovery with Strategy Space Evolution

About

Large Language Model (LLM)-guided evolutionary search is increasingly used for automated algorithm discovery, yet most current methods track search progress primarily through executable programs and scalar fitness. Even when natural-language reasoning is used through heuristic descriptions or reflection, it typically remains transient mutation context or unstructured memory, rather than organized as persistent population-level state over strategic directions. As a result, evolutionary search can struggle to distinguish syntactically different implementations of the same idea, preserve lower-fitness but strategically promising directions, or detect when an entire family of strategies has saturated. We introduce \model, a modular strategy-space layer that turns language-level strategic reasoning into first-class population-level evolutionary state in LLM-driven program search. \model represents each candidate program with an explicit natural-language strategy, clusters the archive by strategy semantics, retrieves behaviorally complementary inspirations, and periodically navigates the strategy landscape to avoid saturated directions. Without modifying the underlying evolutionary algorithms, \model improves existing evolutionary backbones across algorithm discovery, systems optimization, and agent-scaffold design tasks in most settings. Across four systems benchmarks, \model achieves a 20.6% average relative improvement, with the best single run on Prism scoring 3$\times$ higher. These results suggest that persistent strategy representations provide a practical mechanism for improving the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of LLM-guided evolutionary search, pointing toward compound AI systems whose search capabilities benefit from the structured accumulation and reuse of algorithmic strategies.

Sichun Luo, Yi Huang, Haochen Luo, Fengyuan Liu, Guanzhi Deng, Lei Li, Qinghua Yao, Zefa Hu, Junlan Feng, Qi Liu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Math OptimizationCircle Packing Rect
Best Value2.3658
20
Systems OptimizationLLM-SQL
Final Score0.7318
11
Mathematical OptimizationCircle Packing Square
Average Result2.6297
10
Mathematical OptimizationHeilbronn triangles
Average Error0.0274
10
Mathematical OptimizationMinMax Distance
Average MinMax Distance0.2778
10
Systems OptimizationTXN
Best Score4.22e+3
6
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update