Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

EvoSelect: Data-Efficient LLM Evolution for Targeted Task Adaptation

About

Adapting large language models (LLMs) to a targeted task efficiently and effectively remains a fundamental challenge. Such adaptation often requires iteratively improving the model toward a targeted task, yet collecting high-quality human-labeled data to support this process is costly and difficult to scale. As a result, synthetic data generation has emerged as a flexible and scalable alternative. One straightforward approach is through an iterative generation-training loop, where candidate data are synthesized through an external generator, the model is updated using these data and the process is repeated over iterations. However, generated samples can be noisy, highly redundant, or even misaligned with the targeted task distribution. Training indiscriminately on such data can dilute useful learning signals and even degrade model performance. To address this, we introduce a refined paradigm, namely an iterative generation-selection-training loop, which incorporates a selection step prior to model updates. Building on this paradigm, we propose EvoSelect, a data-efficient framework to evolve LLM effectively. Given candidate samples produced by the data generator, EvoSelect selects training data by jointly modeling targeted task alignment and diversity. We estimate task relevance through optimal transport with proxy gradient representations, which quantifies how well candidate samples align with the targeted task distribution. To mitigate redundancy, we incorporate a diversification mechanism that promotes coverage of complementary training samples. By interleaving alignment and diversification, EvoSelect enables progressive LLM evolution toward targeted tasks. Extensive experiments on various benchmarks demonstrate that with either weak or strong data generators, EvoSelect consistently improves adaptation efficacy over existing data selection methods.

Ting-Wei Li, Sirui Chen, Jiaru Zou, Yingbing Huang, Tianxin Wei, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Question AnsweringARC Challenge
Accuracy (ARC)82.85
598
Question AnsweringOpenBookQA
Accuracy81
305
Logical reasoningLogiQA
LogiQA Accuracy49.62
251
Logical reasoningLogiQA-2
Accuracy51.84
116
Commonsense ReasoningCommonsenseQA
Accuracy (pass@1)85.59
108
Science Question AnsweringARC Challenge
Accuracy91.98
108
Question AnsweringMedMCQA
Accuracy61.87
98
Question AnsweringMedQA
Accuracy71.64
86
Science Question AnsweringOpenBookQA
Accuracy94.6
82
Question AnsweringHeadQA
Accuracy80.2
68
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update