Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors
About
Local fine-tuning datasets routinely contain sensitive secrets such as API keys, personal identifiers, and financial records. Although ''local offline fine-tuning'' is often viewed as a privacy boundary, we reveal that compromised model code is sufficient to steal them. Current passive pretrained-weight poisoning attacks, while effective for natural language, fundamentally fail to capture such sparse high-entropy targets due to their reliance on probabilistic semantic prefixes. To bridge this gap, we identify and exploit a practical but overlooked supply-chain vector -- model code camouflaged as standard architectural definitions -- to realize a paradigm shift from passive weight poisoning to active execution hijacking. We introduce a deterministic full-chain memorization mechanism: it locks onto token-level secrets in dynamic computation flows via online tensor-rule matching, and leverages value-gradient decoupling to stealthily inject attack gradients, overcoming gradient drowning to force model memorization. Furthermore, we achieve, for the first time, attacker-verifiable secret stealing through black-box queries that precisely distinguishes true leakage from hallucination. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves over 98\% Strict ASR without compromising the primary task, and can effectively bypass defense measures including DP-SGD, semantic auditing, and code auditing.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight Poisoning Attack | Magicoder | Strict ASR98.38 | 3 | |
| Code Generation | Magicoder | Strict ASR98.38 | 2 | |
| Email Subject Generation | AESLC | Strict ASR99.08 | 2 | |
| Medical Dialogue Summarization | HealthcareMagic | Strict ASR100 | 2 |