Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors

About

Local fine-tuning datasets routinely contain sensitive secrets such as API keys, personal identifiers, and financial records. Although ''local offline fine-tuning'' is often viewed as a privacy boundary, we reveal that compromised model code is sufficient to steal them. Current passive pretrained-weight poisoning attacks, while effective for natural language, fundamentally fail to capture such sparse high-entropy targets due to their reliance on probabilistic semantic prefixes. To bridge this gap, we identify and exploit a practical but overlooked supply-chain vector -- model code camouflaged as standard architectural definitions -- to realize a paradigm shift from passive weight poisoning to active execution hijacking. We introduce a deterministic full-chain memorization mechanism: it locks onto token-level secrets in dynamic computation flows via online tensor-rule matching, and leverages value-gradient decoupling to stealthily inject attack gradients, overcoming gradient drowning to force model memorization. Furthermore, we achieve, for the first time, attacker-verifiable secret stealing through black-box queries that precisely distinguishes true leakage from hallucination. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves over 98\% Strict ASR without compromising the primary task, and can effectively bypass defense measures including DP-SGD, semantic auditing, and code auditing.

Zi Li, Tian Zhou, Wenze Li, Jingyu Hua, Yunlong Mao, Sheng Zhong• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Weight Poisoning AttackMagicoder
Strict ASR98.38
3
Code GenerationMagicoder
Strict ASR98.38
2
Email Subject GenerationAESLC
Strict ASR99.08
2
Medical Dialogue SummarizationHealthcareMagic
Strict ASR100
2
Showing 4 of 4 rows

Other info

Follow for update