Possibilistic Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Learning
About
Deep neural networks achieve impressive results across diverse applications, yet their overconfidence on unseen inputs necessitates reliable epistemic uncertainty modeling. Existing methods for uncertainty modeling face a fundamental dilemma: Bayesian approaches provide principled estimates but remain computationally prohibitive, while efficient second-order predictors lack rigorous connections between their specific objectives and epistemic uncertainty quantification. To resolve this dilemma, we introduce Dirichlet-approximated possibilistic posterior predictions (DAPPr), a principled framework grounded in possibility theory. We define a possibilistic posterior over parameters, project it to the prediction space via supremum operators, and approximate the projected posterior using learnable Dirichlet possibility functions. This projection-and-approximation strategy yields a simple training objective with closed-form solutions. Despite its simplicity, extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks show that DAPPr achieves competitive or superior uncertainty quantification performance over state-of-the-art second-order predictors while maintaining both principled derivation and computational efficiency. Code is available at https://github.com/MaxwellYaoNi/DAPPr.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CUB-200-2011 (test) | Top-1 Acc61.79 | 303 | |
| Image Classification | Stanford Dogs (test) | Top-1 Acc67.08 | 140 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | MNIST (In-distribution) vs Fashion-MNIST (OOD) (test) | AUC0.9955 | 45 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CIFAR-10-LT (ρ = 0.1) | AUPR (SVHN OOD)85.63 | 21 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | MNIST vs KMNIST (test) | -- | 20 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10-LT ρ = 0.01 | Accuracy68.81 | 13 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10-LT (ρ = 0.1) | Test Accuracy86.37 | 13 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CIFAR-10-LT ρ = 0.01 | AUPR (SVHN)64.8 | 13 | |
| Confidence Estimation | CUB-200-2011 (test) | AUPR (Confidence)91.37 | 11 | |
| Confidence Estimation | Stanford Dogs (test) | AUPR90.82 | 11 |