STARE: Step-wise Temporal Alignment and Red-teaming Engine for Multi-modal Toxicity Attack
About
Red-teaming Vision-Language Models is essential for identifying vulnerabilities where adversarial image-text inputs trigger toxic outputs. Existing approaches treat image generation as a black box, returning only terminal toxicity scores and leaving open the question of when and how toxic semantics emerge during multi-step synthesis. We introduce STARE, a hierarchical reinforcement learning framework that treats the denoising trajectory itself as the attack surface, under a direct white-box T2I and query-only black-box VLM setting. By coupling a high-level prompt editor with low-level T2I fine-tuning via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), STARE attains a 68% improvement in Attack Success Rate over state-of-the-art black-box and white-box baselines. More importantly, this trajectory-level view surfaces the Optimization-Induced Phase Alignment phenomenon: vanilla models exhibit diffuse toxicity, whereas adversarial optimization concentrates conceptual harms into early semantic phases and detail-oriented harms into late refinement. Targeted perturbations of either window selectively suppress different toxicity categories, indicating that this temporal structure is a genuine causal handle rather than a side effect of the hierarchical design. The phenomenon turns toxicity formation from a chaotic process into a small set of predictable vulnerability windows, providing both a potent attack engine and a basis for phase-aware safety mechanisms. Content warning: This paper contains examples of toxic content that may be offensive or disturbing.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-modal Toxicity Attack | RTP (test) | Overall Score24.83 | 36 | |
| Multi-modal Toxicity Attack | PTP (PolygloToxicityPrompts) English (test) | Overall Toxicity Rate20.47 | 23 | |
| Multi-modal Toxicity Attack | RealToxicityPrompts (RTP) (test) | Overall Score31.36 | 12 | |
| Multi-modal Red-teaming | RTP and PTP (test) | Refusal Rate (LLaVA)2.3 | 3 |