GEM-FI: Gated Evidential Mixtures with Fisher Modulation
About
Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) enables single-pass uncertainty estimation by predicting Dirichlet evidence, but it can remain overconfident and poorly calibrated, and it often fails to represent multi-modal epistemic uncertainty. We introduce Gated Evidential Mixtures (GEM), a family of models that learns an in-model energy signal and uses it to gate evidential outputs end-to-end in a distance-informed manner. GEM-CORE learns a feature-level energy and maps it to a bounded gate that smoothly suppresses evidence when support is low. To capture epistemic multi-modality without multi-pass ensembling, GEM-MIX adds a lightweight mixture of evidential heads with learned routing weights while preserving single-pass inference. Finally, GEM-FI stabilizes mixture allocations via a Fisher-informed regularizer, reducing head collapse and producing smoother boundary uncertainty. Across image classification and OOD detection benchmarks, GEM improves calibration and ID/OOD separation with single-pass inference. On CIFAR-10, GEM-FI vs. DAEDL improves accuracy from 91.11 to 93.75 (+2.64 pp), reduces Brier x100 from 14.27 to 6.81 (-7.46), and also improves misclassification-detection AUPR from 99.08 to 99.94 (+0.86). For epistemic OOD detection, GEM-FI achieves AUPR/AUROC of 92.59/95.09 on CIFAR-10 to SVHN and 90.20/89.06 on CIFAR-10 to CIFAR-100, compared with 85.54/89.30 and 88.19/86.10 for DAEDL.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 (test) | Accuracy93.75 | 882 | |
| OOD Detection | CIFAR-10 (test) | AUROC89.3 | 115 | |
| Model Calibration | CIFAR10 (test) | -- | 68 | |
| Misclassification Detection | CIFAR-10 (test) | -- | 15 | |
| OOD Detection | CIFAR-10 → SVHN | Aleatoric AUROC94.75 | 14 | |
| OOD Detection | CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 | Aleatoric AUROC88.06 | 14 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CIFAR-10 → SVHN | AUPR (Aleatoric)91.27 | 14 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 | AUPR (Aleatoric)90.3 | 14 | |
| OOD Detection | MNIST → KMNIST | Epistemic AUROC99.95 | 13 | |
| OOD Detection | MNIST → FMNIST | Epistemic AUROC99.99 | 13 |