Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Geometry-Aware Neural Optimizer for Shape Optimization and Inversion

About

Geometry is central to PDE-governed systems, motivating shape optimization and inversion. Classical pipelines conduct costly forward simulation with geometry processing, requiring substantial expert effort. Neural surrogates accelerate forward analysis but do not close the loop because gradients from objectives to geometry are often unavailable. Existing differentiable methods either rely on restrictive parameterizations or unstable latent optimization driven by scalar objectives, limiting interpretability and part-wise control. To address these challenges, we propose Geometry-Aware Neural Optimizer (\textbf{\textsc{GANO}}), an end-to-end differentiable framework that unifies geometry representation, field-level prediction, and automated optimization/inversion in a single latent-space loop. \textsc{GANO} encodes shapes with an auto-decoder and stabilizes latent updates via a denoising mechanism, and a geometry-informed surrogate provides a reliable gradient pathway for geometry updates. Moreover, \textsc{GANO} supports part-wise control through null-space projection and uses remeshing-free projection to accelerate geometry processing. We further prove that denoising induces an implicit Jacobian regularization that reduces decoder sensitivity, yielding controlled deformations. Experiments on three benchmarks spanning 2D Helmholtz, 2D airfoil, and 3D vehicles show state-of-the-art accuracy and stable, controllable updates, achieving up to +55.9% lift-to-drag improvement for airfoils and ~7% drag reduction for vehicles.

Guoze Sun, Tianya Miao, Haoyang Huang, Huaguan Chen, Han Wan, Rui Zhang, Hao Sun• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Forward prediction2D Helmholtz
Relative L1 Error1.71
8
Shape Optimization and InversionHelmholtz
Inference Time (ms)4.97
8
Forward predictionAirFoil 9k
Relative L1 Error8.00e-4
7
Shape Optimization and InversionAirfoil
Latency (ms)4.53
7
Forward predictionDrivAerNet++
Relative L1 Error0.1655
5
Shape Optimization and Inversionvehicle
Inference Time (ms)32.08
5
Airfoil Shape OptimizationAirFoil 9k
Lift Coefficient (CL)1.42
4
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update