Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Learning Visual Feature-Based World Models via Residual Latent Action

About

World models predict future transitions from observations and actions. Existing works predominantly focus on image generation only. Visual feature-based world models, on the other hand, predict future visual features instead of raw video pixels, offering a promising alternative that is more efficient and less prone to hallucination. However, current feature-based approaches rely on direct regression, which leads to blurry or collapsed predictions in complex interactions, while generative modeling in high-dimensional feature spaces still remains challenging. In this work, we discover that a new type of latent action representation, which we refer to as *Residual Latent Action* (RLA), can be easily learned from DINO residuals. We also show that RLA is predictive, generalizable, and encodes temporal progression. Building on RLA, we propose *RLA World Model* (RLA-WM), which predicts RLA values via flow matching. RLA-WM outperforms both state-of-the-art feature-based and video-diffusion world models on simulation and real-world datasets, while being orders of magnitude faster than video diffusion. Furthermore, we develop two robot learning techniques that use RLA-WM to improve policy learning. The first one is a minimalist world action model with RLA that learns from actionless demonstration videos. The second one is the first visual RL framework trained entirely inside a world model learned from offline videos only, using a video-aligned reward and no online interactions or handcrafted rewards. Project page: https://mlzxy.github.io/rla-wm

Xinyu Zhang, Zhengtong Xu, Yutian Tao, Yeping Wang, Yu She, Abdeslam Boularias• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Future Frame PredictionManiSkill 49 (val)
LPIPS0.071
5
Future Frame PredictionIWS 10 (val)
LPIPS0.196
5
Multi-task Robot ManipulationManiSkill Robot Suite Aggregate
Average Success Rate60.7
2
Robot ManipulationXArm Poke Cube
Success Rate95.9
2
Robot ManipulationUR10e Roll Ball
Success Rate73.1
2
Robot ManipulationUR10e PushT
Success Rate20.7
2
Robot ManipulationPanda Pull Cube
Success Rate74.1
2
Robot ManipulationPanda Pull Cube Tool
Success Rate39.9
2
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

GitHub

Follow for update