Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

HTPO: Towards Exploration-Exploitation Balanced Policy Optimization via Hierarchical Token-level Objective Control

About

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a pivotal technique for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the de facto practice of mainstream RL algorithms is to treat all tokens of one response equally and assign the same optimization objective to each token, failing to provide granular guidance for the reasoning process. While in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, different tokens usually play distinct roles. Therefore, the current RL algorithms lack an effective mechanism to dynamically balance the exploration-exploitation trade-off during learning. To this end, we propose Hierarchical Token-level Objective Control Policy Optimization (HTPO), a novel RL algorithm that takes the divide-and-conquer idea to hierarchically partition the response tokens into specific functional groups from three aspects (i.e., prompt difficulty, answer correctness, and token entropy). Within each group, according to the contributions to exploration or exploitation, we design specialized optimization objectives to facilitate the effective execution of each token's expected functionality. In this way, HTPO can achieve a more balanced exploration-exploitation trade-off. Extensive experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks validate the superiority of our HTPO algorithm, which significantly outperforms the strong DAPO baseline (e.g., +8.6% and +6.7% on AIME'24 and AIME'25, respectively). When scaling test-time compute, the HTPO-trained model maintains a consistent performance advantage over the DAPO baseline, and the gap widens as the sampling budget increases, validating that our adaptive token-level control method fosters effective exploration without sacrificing exploitation performance. Code will be at https://github.com/xcyao00/HTPO.

Xincheng Yao, Ruoqi Li, Cheng Chen, Daoxin Zhang, Yi Wu, Yao Hu, Chongyang Zhang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Agentic ReasoningAlfWorld
Success Rate61.4
45
Agentic ReasoningWebshop
Success Rate33.8
45
Mathematical ReasoningAMC 2023
Avg@3296.3
24
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Mean@32 Accuracy75.2
14
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Mean@32 Accuracy66
14
Mathematical ReasoningOlympiadBench
Mean@32 Accuracy60.9
14
Mathematical ReasoningMinerva
Mean@32 Accuracy36.5
14
Code ReasoningLiveCodeBench
Pass@128.7
3
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update