Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Revitalizing the Beginning: Avoiding Storage Dependency for Model Merging in Continual Learning

About

Model merging provides a compelling paradigm for integrating specialized expertise into a unified multi-task model, a goal that aligns naturally with the sequential knowledge acquisition in continual learning (CL). However, the requirement for preserving diverse forms of previous knowledge conflicts with the storage limitations inherent to CL. In this paper, we systematically analyze existing model merging methods under the constraints of CL. We find that current methods prioritize global alignment, which often leads to the accumulation and amplification of task-specific errors within the continuous data stream; and the vanishing gradients at the onset of subsequent tasks frequently cause optimization to stagnate. These leave the merged model in a suboptimal state at the beginning of the next training phase. To address these challenges, we propose Trajectory Regularized Merging (TRM), a framework that reformulates the merging phase as an optimization process within an augmented trajectory subspace. Our framework integrates three synergistic objectives including task alignment, prediction consistency, and gradient responsiveness to concurrently preserve merged model's historical stability and re-activate optimization dynamics. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks.

Xi Wang, Cheng Deng• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Class-incremental learningCIFAR100 10 Tasks
Accuracy80.5
66
Class-incremental learningImageNet-R 5-task--
64
Class-incremental learningCIFAR-100 20 tasks
Accuracy78.6
58
Continual LearningCIFAR-100
Task Forgetting (FGT_T)2.5
46
Continual LearningImageNet-R
Average Forgetting1.8
39
Class-incremental learningStanford Cars CIL, T=10 (test)
Avg Accuracy70.4
33
Class-incremental learningImageNet-R (20 tasks)
Accuracy (20 Tasks)82.7
32
Class-incremental learningImageNet-R 10 tasks
Accuracy (10 Tasks)83.2
31
Class-incremental learningCIFAR100 5 Tasks
Accuracy83.5
31
Continual LearningStanford Cars
Average Forgetting2.9
30
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update