Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Chebyshev Center-Based Direction Selection for Multi-Objective Optimization and Training PINNs

About

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are a promising approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). Their training, however, is often difficult because multiple loss terms induced by PDE residuals and boundary or initial conditions must be optimized simultaneously. To address this difficulty, existing approaches often construct update directions by explicitly enforcing particular desirable properties, such as scale robustness and simultaneous descent. While effective in many cases, such property-by-property designs can make it unclear which conditions are essential, what geometric principle determines the selected update direction, and how different methods are structurally related. In this work, we formulate update-direction selection for PINN training as a Chebyshev-center problem in the dual cone. The proposed formulation selects a normalized direction that maximizes the minimum distance to the cone facets. The resulting formulation admits an efficient dual problem in a much lower-dimensional space and yields a convergence guarantee in the nonconvex setting. It also recovers the key desirable properties targeted by existing approaches without imposing them separately; rather, they follow from the single geometric criterion underlying the formulation. This makes the selected direction interpretable through a single geometric rule and provides a unified basis for systematically comparing related direction-selection methods. Experiments on several PINN benchmarks further demonstrate strong empirical performance of the proposed method.

Hoyeol Yoon, Seoungbin Bae, Nam Ho-Nguyen, Dabeen Lee• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
PDE solvingKlein-Gordon equation
Relative L2 Error0.0218
31
Forward PDE solvingHelmholtz
Relative Error0.0072
26
Forward PDE problem solvingBurgers
Relative L2 Error0.0599
19
PDE solvingHeat2D-CG
Relative L2 Error0.2316
18
Coefficient RecoveryInverse Heat Problem Standard
Relative L2 Error0.0593
9
Coefficient RecoveryInverse Heat Problem Fewer data
Relative L2 Error0.0631
9
Forward PDE problem solvingKovasznay
Relative L2 Error0.0017
9
Coefficient RecoveryInverse Heat Problem Higher noise
Relative L2 Error0.104
9
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update