Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Qwen-Scope: Turning Sparse Features into Development Tools for Large Language Models

About

Large language models have achieved remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, yet their internal decision-making processes remain largely opaque, limiting our ability to inspect, control, and systematically improve them. This opacity motivates a growing body of research in mechanistic interpretability, with sparse autoencoders (SAEs) emerging as one of the most promising tools for decomposing model activations into sparse, interpretable feature representations. We introduce Qwen-Scope, an open-source suite of SAEs built on the Qwen model family, comprising 14 groups of SAEs across 7 model variants from the Qwen3 and Qwen3.5 series, covering both dense and mixture-of-expert architectures. Built on top of these SAEs, we show that SAEs can go beyond post-hoc analysis to serve as practical interfaces for model development along four directions: (i) inference-time steering, where SAE feature directions control language, concepts, and preferences without modifying model weights; (ii) evaluation analysis, where activated SAE features provide a representation-level proxy for benchmark redundancy and capability coverage; (iii) data-centric workflows, where SAE features support multilingual toxicity classification and safety-oriented data synthesis; and (iv) post-training optimization, where SAE-derived signals are incorporated into supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning objectives to mitigate undesirable behaviors such as code-switching and repetition. Together, these results demonstrate that SAEs can serve not only as post-hoc analysis tools, but also as reusable representation-level interfaces for diagnosing, controlling, evaluating, and improving large language models. By open-sourcing Qwen-Scope, we aim to support mechanistic research and accelerate practical workflows that connect model internals to downstream behavior.

Boyi Deng, Xu Wang, Yaoning Wang, Yu Wan, Yubo Ma, Baosong Yang, Haoran Wei, Jialong Tang, Huan Lin, Ruize Gao, Tianhao Li, Qian Cao, Xuancheng Ren, Xiaodong Deng, An Yang, Fei Huang, Dayiheng Liu, Jingren Zhou• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Instruction FollowingIFEval
IFEval Accuracy33.91
836
Commonsense ReasoningHellaSwag
HellaSwag Accuracy39.6
711
Logical reasoningLogiQA
LogiQA Accuracy48.75
251
Mathematical ReasoningMGSM
Accuracy82.4
236
Language UnderstandingMMLU
MMLU Accuracy50.09
147
Code GenerationHumanEval
Accuracy98.27
115
Factuality EvaluationTruthfulQA--
103
Machine TranslationFLORES
BLEU Score40.84
97
General ReasoningBIG-Bench Hard--
68
Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingMMLU
MMLU Accuracy76.58
43
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update