On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs
About
The performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on downstream tasks is fundamentally constrained by the capabilities acquired during pre-training. However, traditional benchmarks like MMLU often fail to reflect a base model's plasticity in complex open-ended scenarios, leading to inefficient model selection. We address this by introducing a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training. We propose RuDE (Rubric-based Discriminative Evaluation), a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination. Guided by our systematic 4C Taxonomy, RuDE constructs controlled contrastive pairs across diverse domains by fine-grained rubric violations. Extensive experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance. Crucially, validation via Reinforcement Learning (RL) confirms that RuDE effectively identifies high-potential smaller models that outperform larger counterparts, offering a compute-efficient mechanism for foundation model development.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discriminative Evaluation | RuDE base | -- | 16 | |
| Generative Performance | AdvancedIF | Pearson r0.91 | 1 | |
| Generative Performance | HealthBench | Pearson r0.67 | 1 | |
| Generative Performance | WritingBench | Pearson r0.62 | 1 | |
| Generative Performance | PRBench | Pearson r0.8 | 1 |