Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Learning Agentic Policy from Action Guidance

About

Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) for Large Language Models (LLMs) critically depends on the exploration capability of the base policy, as training signals emerge only within its in-capability region. For tasks where the base policy cannot reach reward states, additional training or external guidance is needed to recover effective learning signals. Rather than relying on costly iterative supervised fine tuning (SFT), we exploit the abundant action data generated in everyday human interactions. We propose \textsc{ActGuide-RL}, which injects action data as plan-style reference guidance, enabling the agentic policy to overcome reachability barriers to reward states. Guided and unguided rollouts are then jointly optimized via mixed-policy training, internalizing the exploration gains back into the unguided policy. Motivated by a theoretical and empirical analysis of the benefit-risk trade-off, we adopt a minimal intervention principle that invokes guidance only as an adaptive fallback, matching task difficulty while minimizing off-policy risk. On search-agent benchmarks, \textsc{ActGuide-RL} substantially improves over zero RL (+10.7 pp on GAIA and +19 pp on XBench with Qwen3-4B), and performs on par with the SFT+RL pipeline without any cold start. This suggests a new paradigm for agentic RL that reduces the reliance on heavy SFT data by using scalable action guidance instead.

Yuxiang Ji, Zengbin Wang, Yong Wang, Shidong Yang, Ziyu Ma, Guanhua Chen, Zonghua Sun, Liaoni Wu, Xiangxiang Chu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
General AI Assistant TasksGAIA
Avg Performance41.74
72
Instruction Following EvaluationIFEval
IFEval Score82.99
32
Graduate-level Science Question AnsweringGPQA
Performance Score36.93
25
Search Agent Evaluationxbench
Average Score44
18
Web Browsing Competition (Chinese)Browse Comp ZH
Score28.02
18
Search Agent EvaluationBC-ZH
Average Score26.64
17
Web Navigation Question AnsweringWebWalkerQA
Success Rate (Easy)50
14
Cross-platform Tool Usexbench
Score37
5
General Assistant TasksGAIA
Score40.77
5
Truthful Question AnsweringTruthfulQA
TruthfulQA Score62.3
5
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

GitHub

Follow for update