Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

DiffScore: Text Evaluation Beyond Autoregressive Likelihood

About

Autoregressive language models are widely used for text evaluation, however, their left-to-right factorization introduces positional bias, i.e., early tokens are scored with only leftward context, conflating architectural asymmetry with true text quality. We propose masked reconstruction as an alternative paradigm, where every token is scored using full bidirectional context. We introduce DiffScore, an evaluation framework built on Masked Large Diffusion Language Models. By measuring text recoverability across continuous masking rates, DiffScore eliminates positional bias and naturally establishes an evaluation hierarchy from local fluency to global coherence. We further provide diagnostic tools unavailable to autoregressive frameworks: multi-timestep quality profiles that decompose scores across masking rates, and bidirectional PMI decomposition that disentangles fluency from faithfulness. Experiments across ten benchmarks show that DiffScore consistently outperforms autoregressive baselines in both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings. The code is released at: https://github.com/wenlai-lavine/DiffScore.

Wen Lai, Yingli Shen, Dingnan Jin, Qing Cui, Jun Zhou, Maosong Sun, Alexander Fraser• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Data-to-text evaluationSFRES
Spearman Correlation0.256
39
Machine Translation EvaluationWMT 2019 (test)
de-en0.327
25
Data-to-text evaluationSFHOT
Spearman Correlation (Naturalness)0.309
25
Text SummarizationREALSumm system-level
Coverage49.2
15
Text SummarizationQAGS-C
Pearson Correlation Coefficient0.73
15
Text SummarizationQAGS-X
Pearson Correlation0.248
15
Data-to-TextBAGEL
Informativeness (INF)0.326
15
Text SummarizationNewsroom segment-level
Coherence (COH)0.683
15
Text SummarizationRank19
ACC83.6
15
Text SummarizationSummEval segment-level
Coherence38.6
15
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update