Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Fill the GAP: A Granular Alignment Paradigm for Visual Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

About

Visual latent reasoning lets a multimodal large language model (MLLM) create intermediate visual evidence as continuous tokens, avoiding external tools or image generators. However, existing methods usually follow an output-as-input latent paradigm and yield unstable gains. We identify evidence for a feature-space mismatch that can contribute to this instability: dominant visual-latent models build on pre-norm MLLMs and reuse decoder hidden states as predicted latent inputs, even though these states occupy a substantially different norm regime from the input embeddings the model was trained to consume (Xie et al., 2025; Li et al., 2026; Team et al., 2026). This mismatch can make direct latent feedback unreliable. Motivated by this diagnosis, we propose GAP, a Granular Alignment Paradigm for visual latent modeling. GAP aligns visual latent reasoning at three levels: feature-level alignment maps decoder outputs into input-compatible visual latents through a lightweight PCA-aligned latent head; context-level alignment grounds latent targets with inspectable auxiliary visual supervision; and capacity-guided alignment assigns latent supervision selectively to examples where the base MLLM struggles. On Qwen2.5-VL 7B, the resulting model achieves the best mean aggregate perception and reasoning performance among our supervised variants. Inference-time intervention probing further suggests that generated latents provide task-relevant visual signal beyond merely adding token slots.

Yanting Miao, Yutao Sun, Dexin Wang, Mengyu Zhou, Pascal Poupart, Lei Lv, Qi Zhao, Li Wang, Hao Li, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE Adversarial
Accuracy84.49
159
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE Popular
Accuracy85.76
96
Hallucination EvaluationPOPE Overall
Accuracy86.3
21
Multimodal Mathematical ReasoningMathVista
MathVista Score71
8
Multimodal Mathematical ReasoningWeMath
WeMath-S Score36.33
8
Hallucination EvaluationPOPE (Random)
Accuracy88.7
7
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update