Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

U-HNO: A U-shaped Hybrid Neural Operator with Sparse-Point Adaptive Routing for Non-stationary PDE Dynamics

About

Solutions to many partial differential equations (PDEs) display coexisting smooth global transport and localized sharp features within a single trajectory: shock fronts, thin interfaces, and concentrated high-frequency content sit on top of slowly varying backgrounds. This poses a challenge for neural operators: Fourier-based architectures mix nonlocal interactions efficiently but tend to under-resolve localized non-smooth features, whereas spatially local architectures recover fine detail at the cost of long-range propagation and rollout stability. Existing hybrid operators paper over this tension with a fixed, spatially uniform fusion that forces the same trade-off everywhere. We propose U-HNO, a U-shaped hybrid neural operator whose central design is Sparse-Point Adaptive Routing (SPAR): at every spatial location, a per-pixel hard mask selects whether the global Fourier branch or the local multi-scale Gaussian branch should dominate, and the sparsity ratio is a function of the local contrast of the routing signal, so smooth and shock-aligned regions receive different mixtures of global and local computation. SPAR is embedded in a hierarchical encoder-bottleneck-decoder backbone with skip connections so that the dual branches and the gate operate at every resolution. Training combines pointwise supervision with a finite-difference H^1 gradient term and a band-wise spectral consistency regularizer. Across benchmarks spanning 1D Burgers, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky, KdV, 2D advection, Allen-Cahn, Navier-Stokes, Darcy flow, and 3D transonic compressible Navier-Stokes from PDEBench, U-HNO achieves state-of-the-art rollout accuracy on the majority of tasks in both relative L^2 and H^1 metrics, with the largest gains on problems dominated by sharp localized features. Ablations show that removing any single component substantially degrades rollout error.

Yingzhe Ma, Xiao Yang, Yuxin Xie, Zihan Xiong, Jinliang Liu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
PDE solvingDarcy (test)
Relative Error0.72
11
PDE Rollout PredictionBurgers trajectory set (test)
Rollout Relative H14.18
8
PDE Rollout PredictionKS trajectory set (test)
Relative H1 Error40.55
8
PDE Rollout PredictionKdV trajectory set (test)
Rollout Relative H1 Error0.0523
8
PDE Rollout PredictionDarcy trajectory set (test)
Rollout Relative H1 Error0.0165
8
PDE Rollout SimulationBurgers' (test)
Relative L2 Error4.16
8
PDE Rollout SimulationKdV (test)
Rollout Relative L2 Error5.02
8
Long-Horizon StabilityNS-2D (test)
MSE0.0066
8
PDE Rollout SimulationKS (test)
Relative L2 Error (Rollout)0.405
8
PDE Rollout PredictionNS-2D trajectory set (test)
Rollout Relative H1 Error0.9
8
Showing 10 of 19 rows

Other info

Follow for update