Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Ergodic Trajectory Design by Learned Pushforward Maps: Provable Coverage via Conditional Flow Matching

About

Designing continuous trajectories whose time-averaged occupancy provably matches a prescribed spatial density (the \emph{ergodic coverage} problem) is central to UAV-assisted data collection and sensing, robotic exploration, and mobile monitoring. For flying agents in particular, this challenge is acute: trajectories must balance coverage fidelity against tight energy budgets, no-fly zones, and acceleration limits. Existing methods either re-optimize each trajectory online (with cost growing in the horizon and re-running for every target, agent, and realization) or rely on bespoke analytical constructions that must be re-derived for each new constraint. We propose a \emph{epushforward} framework that decouples ergodicity from density matching: an analytic latent trajectory provides exact uniform ergodicity on a simple annular domain, and a single map, learned offline by optimal-transport conditional flow matching, transports this latent occupancy onto the prescribed target density. The composed trajectory is then asymptotically ergodic with respect to the learned pushforward distribution, with deviation from the target controlled by the flow-matching training loss. Once trained for a given target density and constraint set, the map serves an unbounded number of trajectories and a multi-agent fleet without per-agent retraining, and many differentiable operational constraints (no-fly zones, acceleration ceilings, or fairness penalties) enter as additive soft penalties in the training loss without re-deriving the design. We prove three results (an acceleration-energy bound, an $O(1/\sqrt{K})$ ergodic convergence rate in the number of trajectory cycles $K$, and an approximation-error bound) that combine into an end-to-end coverage bound estimable from CFM training diagnostics (certified given an architectural Lipschitz bound on $v_\theta$).

Ehsan Aghazadeh, Masoud Malekzadeh, Ahmad Ghasemi, Hossein Pishro-Nik• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Trajectory PlanningMilano 1D NFZ
L1 Error0.438
12
Trajectory PlanningMilano MD NFZ
L1 Path Deviation0.408
12
UAV CoverageMilano single-disc 1D (test)
Rho86.5
12
UAV CoverageMilano multi-disc MD (test)
Rho0.911
12
No-fly-zone violation avoidanceMilano (1D)
Max Depth0.007
12
No-fly-zone violation avoidanceMilano (MD)
Max Depth0.028
12
Trajectory GenerationMilano (single-disc)
Median Velocity (m/s)19.8
11
Trajectory GenerationMilano (multi-disc)
Median Velocity (m/s)18.9
11
Trajectory Generation1D scenario
Online Cost779
7
Trajectory GenerationMD scenario
Online Cost780
7
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update