Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

EMO: Frustratingly Easy Progressive Training of Extendable MoE

About

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models offer a powerful way to scale model size without increasing compute, as per-token FLOPs depend only on k active experts rather than the total pool of E experts. Yet, this asymmetry creates an MoE efficiency paradox in practice: adding more experts balloons memory and communication costs, making actual training inefficient. We argue that this bottleneck arises in part because current MoE training allocates too many experts from the beginning, even though early-stage data may not fully utilize such capacity. Motivated by this, we propose EMO, a simple progressive training framework that treats MoE capacity as expandable memory and grows the expert pool over the course of training. EMO explicitly models sparsity in scaling law to derive stage-wise compute-optimal token budgets for progressive expansion. Empirical results show that EMO matches the performance of a fixed-expert setup in large-scale experiments while improving wall-clock efficiency. It offers a surprisingly simple yet effective path to scalable MoE training, preserving the benefits of large expert pools while reducing both training time and GPU cost.

Linghao Jin, Chufan Shi, Huijuan Wang, Nuan Wen, Zhengzhong Liu, Eric Xing, Xuezhe Ma• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Question AnsweringARC-E
Accuracy75.18
523
Question AnsweringARC-C
Accuracy42.49
258
Social Commonsense ReasoningSIQA
Accuracy42.48
112
Physical Commonsense ReasoningPIQA
Accuracy (PIQA)74.81
99
Open-domain Question AnsweringTriviaQA
EM33.77
88
Open-domain Question AnsweringNatural Questions (NQ)
Exact Match (EM)13.35
82
Pronoun ResolutionWinoGrande
Accuracy61.88
58
Boolean Question AnsweringBoolQ
Accuracy70.52
57
Causal ReasoningCOPA
Accuracy80
51
OpenBook Question AnsweringOBQA
Accuracy29.6
32
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update