Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Beyond What to Select: A Plug-and-play Oscillatory Data-Volume Scheduling for Efficient Model Training

About

Data selection accelerates training by identifying representative training data while preserving model performance. However, existing methods mainly focus on designing sample-importance criteria, i.e., deciding what to select, while typically fixing the selected data volume as the target ratio throughout training. Thus, they are often dynamic in sample identity but static in data volume. In this work, we revisit data selection from an optimization perspective and show that selected-data training induces an implicit regularization effect modulated by the instantaneous selection ratio. This reveals a key trade-off: lower ratios amplify selection-induced regularization, whereas higher ratios preserve data coverage and optimization fidelity. Motivated by this insight, we propose PODS, a Plug-and-play Oscillatory Data-volume Scheduling framework. Rather than introducing another sample-scoring metric, PODS serves as a lightweight module that dynamically schedules how much data to select over training. Under the target selection ratio, PODS alternates between low-ratio regularization phases and high-ratio recovery phases to exploit selection-induced regularization without sacrificing optimization stability. With its lightweight, ratio-level, and task-agnostic design, PODS is compatible with existing static and dynamic selection methods and broadly applicable across training paradigms. Experiments across various datasets, architectures, and tasks show that PODS consistently improves the efficiency-generalization trade-off, e.g., reducing ImageNet-1k training cost by 50% with improved accuracy and accelerating LLM instruction tuning by over 2x without performance degradation.

Suorong Yang, Hanqi Zhu, Hai Gan, Fangjian Su, Guang Li, Furao Shen, Soujanya Poria• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningOlympiad Bench
Accuracy66
222
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Accuracy79.4
204
Image ClassificationTiny-ImageNet
Accuracy (%)49
131
Image ClassificationImageNet-1K
Top-1 Accuracy76.8
78
Long-Tailed Image ClassificationImageNet LT
Accuracy (Many)43
37
Instruction TuningBBH
Accuracy (BBH)66.2
24
General TasksMMLU-Pro
Accuracy66.4
23
General CapabilityGPQA Diamond
Accuracy37.4
4
Instruction TuningMMLU
MMLU Score74
4
Long-tailed classificationPlaces-LT
Accuracy (Many-shot)43
2
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update