Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Taming "Zombie'' Agents: A Markov State-Aware Framework for Resilient Multi-Agent Evolution

About

Recent advancements in LLM-based multi-agent systems have demonstrated remarkable collaborative capabilities across complex tasks. To improve overall efficiency, existing methods often rely on aggressive graph evolution among agents (e.g., node or edge pruning), which risks prematurely discarding valuable agents due to transient issues such as hallucinations or temporary knowledge gaps. However, such hard pruning overlooks the potential for ``zombie'' agents to recover and contribute in subsequent discussion rounds. In this paper, we propose AgentRevive, a Markov state-aware framework for resilient multi-agent evolution. Our approach dynamically manages agent collaboration through soft state transitions, implemented via two key components: (1) State-Aware Policy Learning: Agent states are divided into ``Active'', ``Standby'', and ``Terminated'' states, selectively propagating messages based on agent memory. The policy employs a risk estimator to optimize agent state transitions by assessing hallucination risk, minimizing the influence of unreliable nodes while safeguarding valuable ones. (2) State-Aware Edge Optimization: Subgraph edges are pruned according to states learned from the policy, permanently removing ``Terminated'' nodes and retaining ``Standby'' nodes for subsequent rounds to assess their potential future contributions. Extensive experiments on general reasoning, domain-specific, and hallucination challenge tasks show that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines and significantly reduces token consumption through state-aware agent scheduling.

Taolin Zhang, Pukun Zhao, Qizhou Chen, Jiuheng Wan, Chen Chen, Xiaofeng He, Chengyu Wang, Richang Hong• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multitask Language UnderstandingMMLU
Accuracy86.09
520
Math ReasoningAQUA
Accuracy88.85
188
Math Word Problem SolvingGSM8K
Accuracy94.87
158
Code GenerationHumanEval
Accuracy93.52
115
TruthfulnessTruthfulQA
Truthfulness Accuracy72.36
51
Multiple-choice Question AnsweringAQUA
Accuracy89.45
43
Mathematical Word Problem SolvingSVAMP
Accuracy96.94
38
Question Answering (Truthfulness)TruthfulQA
Accuracy72.05
12
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update