Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

WinQ: Accelerating Quantization-Aware Training of Language Models Around Saddle Points

About

Quantization-aware training (QAT) is widely adopted to quantize language models by training full-precision weights using gradients from the quantized model. The main bottleneck is its slow convergence and early performance plateau, particularly below 4-bit-widths. While this problem has been observed in prior work, its precise cause remains unclear. In this paper, we analyze the convergence of QAT by estimating the spectrum of the loss-surface Hessians. We find that the weights converge to flat regions around saddle points, where a large fraction of the Hessian eigenvalues are both positive and negative. During training, an increasing fraction of Hessian eigenvalues concentrates around zero, whose magnitude decreases. At lower bit-widths, the magnitude of eigenvalues in the Hessian spectrum is significantly smaller. To mitigate these issues, we propose an algorithm called WinQ to accelerate QAT, which involves: (1) periodically resetting weights to the linear interpolation of full-precision and quantized weights, reducing the distance to the quantization grid and increasing eigenvalue magnitude, and (2) computing gradients of noise-injected weights to regularize the Hessian. Extensive experiments show that WinQ accelerates QAT by up to 4 times across various quantization methods and models. Under the same training cost, WinQ improves state-of-the-art sub-4-bit quantization by up to 8.8%. These results are consistent across 16 settings with different language models, quantization methods, and bit widths.

Dongyue Li, Zechun Liu, Kai Yi, Zhenshuo Zhang, Changsheng Zhao, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, Harshit Khaitan, Hongyang R. Zhang, Steven Li• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Language ModelingWikiText2
Perplexity10.2
3785
Language ModelingWikiText-2 (test)
PPL8.3
2333
Question AnsweringEight QA datasets Average
Accuracy58.6
55
Language ModelingLanguage Modeling
Perplexity21.8
26
Zero-shot EvaluationZero-shot Tasks
Task Avg Score48.2
26
Zero-shot Language ModelingLLaMA-3-1B Zero-shot
Perplexity (PPL)16.9
5
Question AnsweringQA Benchmark Suite Zero-shot (test)
Average Accuracy65.3
2
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update