Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

iGSP:Implicit Gradient Subspace Projection for Efficient Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models

About

Vision-Language Models require efficient adaptation to continually emerging downstream tasks. While Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning mitigates catastrophic forgetting, assigning isolated modules per task leads to parameter explosion. Conversely, recent similarity-driven sharing mechanisms falsely equate superficial visual similarity with underlying alignment consistency. This fundamental mismatch triggers severe negative transfer between visually similar but logically distinct tasks and fails to exploit alignment reuse across visually diverse ones. We argue thatalignment sharing is fundamentally a geometric problem of overlapping optimization trajectories within shared low-rank subspaces. Grounded in this insight, we propose iGSP, a novel framework that achieves efficient adaptation via implicit gradient subspace projection. Leveraging the early convergence of MoE routers to establish the subspace basis, iGSP bifurcates the adaptation process into two phases. First, the Subspace Identification phase introduces candidate experts via basis pre-expansion, applies a novel subspace-constrained regularization to implicitly project new task gradients onto the historical subspace, and precisely prunes redundant dimensions by treating routing probabilities as gradient flow indicators, ultimately to maximize knowledge reuse. Second, the Orthogonal Subspace Fine-Tuning phase fixes this structural basis and removes the regularization to rapidly fit the task-specific residual loss. Extensive experiments on the MTIL benchmark demonstrate that iGSP achieves state-of-the-art accuracy while significantly improving training efficiency, reducing the average trainable parameters by 42.7\% compared to current SOTA methods, and decreasing the final total parameters by 86.9\% relative to counterparts. The source code is available at https://github.com/GeoX-Lab/iGSP.

Xuezhi Cui, Dongbo Zhou, Wang Guo, Zeyuan Wang, Ziyu Li, Gaozhi Zhou, Xian Li, Ling Zhao, Wentao Yang, Chao Tao, Haifeng Li• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-Task Incremental LearningMTIL Order II
Average Acc76.5
76
Class-incremental learningCIFAR-100 (10-split)
Accuracy85.34
63
Class-incremental learningCIFAR100 50 steps (test)
Last Accuracy75.13
34
Multi-domain Task-Incremental LearningMTIL Order I (test)
Average Accuracy78
30
Class-incremental learningTinyImageNet 10 steps 100 base classes (test)
Avg Accuracy80.55
27
Class-incremental learningTinyImageNet 100 base classes (5-step)
Average Accuracy81.14
14
Class-incremental learningTinyImageNet 100 base classes (20-step)
Average Accuracy80.01
14
Class-incremental learningCIFAR100 20-step split
Average Accuracy83.99
13
Few-Shot Multi-Task Incremental LearningMTIL FS OrderI
Transfer Value69.9
9
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update