Learning with Foresight: Enhancing Neural Routing Policy via Multi-Node Lookahead Prediction
About
Neural policies have shown promise in solving vehicle routing problems due to their reduced reliance on handcrafted heuristics. However, current training paradigms suffer from a fundamental limitation: they primarily focus on next-node prediction for solution construction, resulting in myopic decision-making that undermines long-horizon planning capacity. To this end, we introduce Multi-node Lookahead Prediction (MnLP), a novel training strategy that extends the supervised learning paradigm to predict multiple future nodes simultaneously. We incorporate causal and discardable MnLP modules that operate exclusively during training, facilitating models to anticipate multi-step decisions while preserving inference-time efficiency. By incorporating multi-depth auxiliary supervision into the loss function, MnLP equips neural policies with the ability of long-range contextual understanding. Experimentally, MnLP outperforms existing training methods, improving the generalization capability of neural policies across various problem sizes, distributions, and real-world benchmarks. Moreover, MnLP can be seamlessly integrated into diverse neural architectures without introducing additional inference overhead.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLib Set X | Average Optimality Gap9.024 | 114 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | Euclidean TSP n=100 Uniform distribution in unit square (test) | Tour Length7.763 | 27 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | Euclidean TSP n=500 Uniform distribution in unit square (test) | Tour Length16.55 | 27 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | Uniform Distribution n=200 (test) | Objective Value20.121 | 14 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | Uniform Distribution n=500 (test) | Objective Value37.133 | 14 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | Uniform Distribution n=100 (test) | Objective Value15.648 | 14 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | Uniform Distribution n=1000 (test) | Objective Value37.516 | 14 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | Uniform Distribution n=200 (test) | Objective Value10.705 | 13 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | Uniform Distribution n=1000 (test) | Objective Value23.268 | 13 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLib Set E | Average Optimality Gap4.791 | 7 |