Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Automated Random Embedding for Practical Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Effective Dimension

About

Bayesian optimization is widely employed for optimizing complex black-box functions but struggles with the curse of dimensionality. Random embedding, as a dimension reduction strategy, simplifies tasks that possess the effective dimension by optimizing within a low-dimensional subspace. However, determining the effective dimension of a task in advance remains a significant challenge, which influences the selection of the subspace dimensionality and the optimization performance. Traditional methods use fixed subspace dimensions provided by experts or rely on trial and error to estimate subspace dimensions with resources consumed. To this end, this paper proposes an automated random embedding for high-dimensional Bayesian optimization with unknown effective dimension, called Dynamic Shared Embedding Bayesian Optimization (DSEBO). DSEBO starts with a low dimension and switches to a higher subspace if the solutions in the current subspace show preliminary convergence. DSEBO dynamically determines the dimension of the next subspace based on the quality of the solutions in different subspaces and shares the queried solutions with the new subspace for a better initialization. Theoretically, we derive a regret bound for DSEBO and demonstrate that DSEBO can better balance approximation and optimization errors. Extensive experiments on functions with dimensionality of varying magnitudes and real-world tasks with unknown effective dimensions reveal that, compared with state-of-the-art methods, alternating optimization across different subspaces results in significant improvements in high-dimensional optimization, both in terms of optimization regret and time.

Hong Qian, Xiang Shu, Xiang Xia, Xuhui Liu, Yangde Fu, Bei Liang, Huibin Wang, Liang Dou• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
High-dimensional optimizationMSLR
Convergence Value-8.9396
21
High-dimensional optimizationLasso-Hard
Convergence Value3.8613
20
High-dimensional optimizationLIMO
Convergence Value-10.6613
20
Function OptimizationSphere D=1000
Final Value3.9387
19
Function OptimizationLevy D=1000
Convergence Value2.2816
19
Function OptimizationGriewank D=1000
Convergence Value (Statistic)11.2488
19
Function OptimizationDixon D=1000
Convergence Value3.91e+4
19
Function OptimizationMichalewicz D=1000
Convergence Value-10.6887
19
Function OptimizationRosenbrock D=1000
Convergence Value3.77e+4
19
High-dimensional optimizationSphere D=10000
Objective Value (Sphere D=10000)6.4338
13
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update