Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Rethinking Continual Anomaly Detection on the Edge: Benchmarking Under Realistic Industrial Conditions

About

Continual anomaly detection (CAD) addresses the need for industrial inspection systems to adapt to evolving production conditions, yet existing methods share three critical gaps: unrealistic evaluation, no systematic comparison, and no consideration of edge deployment constraints. We introduce a unified benchmark combining discrete-task evaluation on structural and logical anomalies, a novel continuous drift protocol, the first head-to-head comparison of all published CAD methods, and computational efficiency profiling on edge hardware. Our results reveal that existing CAD methods do not consistently outperform traditional approaches with simple experience replay. Thus motivated, we propose DINOSaur, a training-free method combining a frozen DINOv3 backbone with spatially-indexed coreset memory and neighborhood-restricted anomaly scoring. DINOSaur achieves zero forgetting by construction, outperforms all evaluated methods across all five protocols, and runs at sub-100\,ms inference on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano, with on-device adaptation to new tasks in under 30 seconds.

Chad Weatherly, Sen Lin• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image-level Anomaly DetectionMVTec-AD (test)
Overall AUROC96.3
92
Image-level Anomaly DetectionMVTec LOCO AD (test)
AUROC76
16
Continual Anomaly DetectionMTD-Color averaged across all tasks
AUROC0.888
6
Continual Anomaly DetectionMTD-Geo averaged across all tasks
AUROC53.2
6
Continual Anomaly DetectionMTD-Blur averaged across all tasks
AUROC86.4
6
Continual Anomaly DetectionMVTec AD
Inference Time (ms)630.6
6
Continual Anomaly DetectionMVTec AD
Inference Latency (ms)91.6
5
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update