Momentum Streams for Optimizer-Inspired Transformers
About
The residual update of a pre-norm Transformer layer admits an interpretation as one step of a first-order optimizer acting on a surrogate token energy, wherein the attention and MLP sublayers function as gradient oracles. Based on this observation, we build a family of optimizer-inspired Transformers (triple-momentum, Adam/AdamW, Muon, SOAP) and compare them under matched compute. In our main pretraining experiment, the triple-momentum TMMFormer achieves the lowest validation loss, outperforming the vanilla Transformer and prior architectural variants. A controlled ablation and supporting theory show that momentum, not preconditioning, is the main source of the gain. We further show that TMMFormer and other momentum-based designs reach flatter minima than the vanilla Transformer, which leads to less forgetting and better generalization.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language Modeling | OpenWebText (val) | Validation Loss2.9342 | 114 | |
| Zero-shot Accuracy | ARC Easy | Zero-shot Acc (ARC Easy)43.43 | 67 | |
| Commonsense Reasoning | HellaSwag (val) | Accuracy31.82 | 54 | |
| Zero-shot Prediction | HellaSwag | Zero-shot HellaSwag Accuracy31.82 | 43 | |
| Language Modeling | TinyStories (val) | Last Loss1.1284 | 21 | |
| Question Answering | ARC-Easy (val) | Accuracy43.43 | 14 | |
| Language Modeling | TinyStories 10k (val) | Validation Loss (nats/token)1.1284 | 7 | |
| Language Modeling | OpenWebText 30k (val) | Loss (nats/token)2.9342 | 6 |