Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Closed-Form Node Classification with Exact Graph Unlearning

About

Graph neural networks for node classification are typically trained by gradient descent over hundreds or thousands of epochs. Recent work has shown that, when properly tuned, classic GCN/SAGE/GAT architectures can match graph transformers on many node-classification benchmarks. We ask a complementary question: how much of this performance can be recovered by deterministic closed-form solvers, and what guarantees does this enable? We introduce a routed closed-form framework selected by adjusted homophily. For assortative graphs, we use SGC-style propagation followed by Ridge regression; for heterophilous graphs, we introduce LCF-Net, a layer-wise closed-form graph feature-refinement network whose per-layer Ridge solves are capped by a Gaussian kernel-Ridge head. Across 14 benchmarks, including ogbn-arxiv and ogbn-proteins, our closed-form predictors match or beat the best vanilla 2-layer GCN/SAGE/GAT on 9 of 9 measured datasets, tie tuned deep recipes within one standard deviation on 9 of 12 small benchmarks, and exceed the OGB-leaderboard plain GCN on both large graphs. The remaining heterophilous gap closely tracks the gain from vanilla 2-layer to deep SAGE, suggesting that the residual difference is primarily architectural. Because our predictors are explicit solutions of deterministic linear systems, modified graph inputs can be re-solved to obtain retrain-equivalent parameters. We formalize exact graph-object unlearning for label, feature, edge, node, and subgraph modifications, prove K-hop locality for Ridge components, and verify exactness across 109 configurations. On ogbn-arxiv, localized updates give $21$--$45\times$ speedups over full re-solving and roughly $10^{6}\times$ speedups over gradient retraining. Structural-inversion experiments further quantify the privacy floor of exact retraining and the additional leakage of approximate graph-unlearning methods.

Aditya Gaur, Charu Sharma• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy80.7
627
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy84
583
Node ClassificationRoman-Empire
Accuracy83.02
327
Node ClassificationAmazon Photo
Accuracy96.34
313
Node Classificationamazon-ratings
Accuracy53.44
309
Node ClassificationOgbn-arxiv
Accuracy71.91
304
Node ClassificationCoauthor CS
Accuracy95.99
158
Node Classificationquestions
ROC AUC0.7818
127
Node Classificationogbn-proteins
ROC AUC74.87
113
Node ClassificationCoauthor Physics
Accuracy96.67
104
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update