Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Dual-Pathway Geometry-Aware MLLM for Spatial Intelligence

About

Spatial understanding of the physical world from 2D visual inputs hinges on two complementary forms of geometric knowledge: holistic 3D structural perception and fine-grained metric scale estimation. Existing multimodal large language models (MLLMs) typically address only one facet, ingesting either depth maps or point clouds as additional model inputs, which incurs substantial computational overhead and inherits the generalization limitations of upstream prediction models. We propose GAMSI, a dual-pathway Geometry-Aware MLLM for Spatial Intelligence that takes only RGB images as input while internalizing both forms of geometric prior within a unified autoregressive backbone. Specifically, we introduce Metric-Structure Decoupled Queries (MSDQ) which employ two groups of learnable queries to respectively extract dense metric signals and sparse structural cues from the shared visual context, with a task-decoupled attention mask further preventing the two pathways from contaminating each other. Building on this, an Expert-Guided Visual Grounding (EVG) module projects the aggregated cues back to frame-level visual features and aligns them with vision foundation models, which serve purely as training-time supervision, rather than as model inputs. We further build a multi-task spatial instruction-tuning dataset (MTS) comprising 152{,}776 samples spanning 13 task types and three visual modalities, consolidated from six public datasets. Trained with a two-stage curriculum, GAMSI achieves state-of-the-art performance on seven spatial intelligence benchmarks.

Yufei Zheng, Xuhan Zhu, Zide Liu, Chunpeng Zhou, Chenfeng Wang, Yongchao Xu, Yunnan Wang, Jiawei Liu, Pengfei Yu, Wei Zhai, Yang Cao, Zheng-Jun Zha• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-view spatial reasoningMindCube (tiny)
Overall Accuracy94.1
43
Spatial ReasoningSPBench SI
Accuracy79.1
42
Video Visual Question AnsweringVSI-Bench
ACC (MCA)68.5
28
Computer Vision ReasoningCV-Bench
Accuracy85.7
26
Spatial Relationship ReasoningSPAR-Bench
Accuracy (Avg)59.9
26
Multi-image Spatial ReasoningSPBench MV
Accuracy80.4
19
Perspective-dependent reasoningViewSpatial-Bench
Accuracy63
19
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update