Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

A Signal-Language Foundation Model for Broad-Spectrum Cardiovascular Assessment from Routine Electrocardiography

About

Electrocardiography (ECG) is central to cardiovascular care, but conventional AI models are often restricted to common arrhythmias and may generalize poorly across populations or clinically subtle diseases. We developed ECG Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (ECGCLIP), a signal-language contrastive learning framework that aligns ECG waveforms with expert diagnostic reports. ECGCLIP was pre-trained on 2,837,962 ECG studies from 1,324,856 patients and evaluated on a held-out internal test set plus nine independent external cohorts comprising about 1.5 million ECGs. Evaluation covered 89 downstream tasks, including 45 ECG diagnoses, 39 echocardiographic targets, and 5 rare cardiac diseases, using PRAUC as the primary metric. ECGCLIP consistently improved performance over random initialization and Merl-R18 baselines. On the internal test set, ECGCLIP-R34 achieved strong performance for atrial fibrillation (PRAUC 0.900) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (PRAUC 0.383), with robust generalization across all external cohorts. It also improved low-prevalence and diagnostically elusive diseases, including Ebstein anomaly, constrictive pericarditis, dextrocardia, and cardiac amyloidosis, with internal PRAUC values of 0.253, 0.175, 0.121, and 0.201, respectively. ECGCLIP was data efficient, matching or exceeding full-dataset baseline performance with only 10% of training data. Feature visualization and saliency analysis suggested clinically meaningful representations aligned with established electrocardiographic criteria. These findings indicate that large-scale ECG-report contrastive pre-training can expand routine ECG interpretation beyond common arrhythmias toward broad cardiovascular assessment and opportunistic screening of echocardiographic and rare conditions.

Ziqing Yu, Yuhui Tao, Jiayu Huo, Lei Pan, Zilong Xiao, Juecheng Chen, Xiao Li, Jianxuan Li, You Zhou, Zhixing Li, Cong Wang, Beijian Zhang, Chen Chen, Hongyang Lu, Konstantinos Patlatzoglou, Daniel B. Kramer, Jonathan W. Waks, Yangang Su, Fu Siong Ng, Shuo Wang, Yixiu Liang, Junbo Ge• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
STEMI ClassificationGeorgia cohort external (test)
PRAUC95.6
8
ECG InterpretationZhongshan Tier 1 (test)
PRAUC48.2
7
ECG InterpretationXiamen Tier 1 (test)
PRAUC49.6
7
ECG InterpretationMIMIC-IV-ECG Tier 1 (test)
PRAUC27.3
7
ECG InterpretationUKB Tier 1 (test)
PRAUC36.7
7
ECG InterpretationChapman Tier 1 (test)
PRAUC29
7
ECG InterpretationGeorgia Tier 1 (test)
PRAUC0.31
7
ECG InterpretationCPSC 2018 Tier 1 (test)
PRAUC65
7
ECHO DiagnosisZhongshan Tier 2 (test)
PRAUC31
7
ECHO DiagnosisShiyuan Tier 2 (test)
PRAUC18.6
7
Showing 10 of 47 rows

Other info

Follow for update