Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Reading the Finetuning Prior: Verbatim Content Recovery via Contrastive Decoding Diffing

About

Narrowly finetuned language models memorize implanted content verbatim, but auditing what a deployed model has been taught, without access to its weights or training data, remains an open challenge. Recent work shows that activation differences between base and finetuned models carry readable traces of the finetuning domain; the state-of-the-art Activation Difference Lens (ADL) recovers a vague domain-level description but requires full "white-box" access to model internals. We introduce Contrastive Decoding Diffing (CDD), a model diffing method that operates on output-level logit distributions only, with no weight access, no layer selection, and no per-model tuning, yet recovers implanted facts. CDD consists of three ideas: bypassing the chat template to expose the raw finetuning prior, seeding generation with maximally vague pre-fills, and amplifying the logit-space difference between finetuned and base models at each decoding step. A single default configuration recovers implanted facts verbatim -- exact drug names, vote counts, physical measurements, and procedural details -- across four architectures (1B--32B parameters), uniformly outperforming ADL despite less access and running ~170x faster. Furthermore, CDD surfaces unintended data pipeline artifacts: a fictional persona introduced by the LLM data generator via mode collapse leaked into model weights and was extracted by CDD, constituting to our knowledge the first demonstrated end-to-end fingerprinting chain from data generator artifact to model weights to recovered output. We validate on real-domain finetuning settings, achieving near-perfect recovery across all single-dataset non-CoT variants and correctly identifying all four datasets in the mixed-dataset setting. CDD's success as a grey-box method outperforming white-box baselines underscores its practical utility for transparency and accountability in AI systems.

Micha{\l} Brzozowski, Zuzanna Dubanowska, Enrico Cassano, Neo Christopher Chung• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Efficiency EvaluationFive Organisms
Mean Inference Time (s)13
10
On-disk storage measurement5 SDF organisms fineweb-1m-sample
ADL (MB)117
8
Verbatim Content RecoverySDF Cake Bake 1.0 (test)
Verbatim Recovery Score (1-5)5
8
Verbatim Content RecoverySDF FDA Approval 1.0 (test)
Verbatim Recovery Score5
8
Verbatim Content RecoverySDF Ignore Comment 1.0 (test)
Verbatim Recovery Score4
8
Verbatim Content RecoverySDF Kansas Abortion 1.0 (test)
Verbatim Recovery Score5
8
Verbatim Content RecoverySDF Roman Concrete 1.0 (test)
Verbatim Recovery Score5
8
Finetuning domain recoveryCLadder
Recovery Score (Grader 1)5
4
Finetuning domain recoveryCOPA
Recovery Score (Grader 1)5
4
Finetuning domain recoveryCorr2Cause
Recovery Score (Grader 1)5
4
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update