Semantic Validation of Packer Identification Tools: Characterization, Repair, and Downstream Impact

Packer identification tools are a critical foundation of malware analysis, directly affecting unpacking, behavioral analysis, malware classification, and threat attribution. However, their semantic correctness is rarely validated. In practice, a tool may return a plausible packer label that is nevertheless semantically wrong, leading to failed unpacking and unreliable downstream analysis. This paper presents a semantic validation framework for testing and repairing packer identification tools. Our key idea is to use unpackers as executable semantic contracts. If a tool predicts a packer family, the corresponding unpacker should recover analyzable program content. This enables automatic test oracles without requiring manually labeled ground truth. Building on this idea, we develop a systematic pipeline for detecting, localizing, and repairing semantic faults in existing packer identification tools. We then conduct the first large-scale empirical study of semantic bugs in eleven open-source packer identification tools and six proprietary VirusTotal tools. Our results reveal that semantic bugs are widespread and recurring, largely due to incomplete signatures and unstable heuristic logic. After repair, packer identification coverage improves by up to 58.6%, and downstream malware classification performance improves by more than 13.6% on average. These findings show that semantic validation of packer identification tools is essential for building trustworthy malware analysis pipelines.