Confidence and Calibration of Activation Oracles for Reliable Interpretation of Language Model Internals
About
Activation oracles aim to make the activations of other models legible to humans and yield promising results compared to white-box interpretability techniques. However, uncertainty quantification (UQ) for the natural-language outputs of such activation oracles is so far understudied. Here, we investigate 6 different methods for estimating the confidence of activation oracles and evaluate how well-calibrated their confidence scores are. Our experiments on 6,000 samples per oracle (varying verbalizer and context prompts) reveal that bootstrap mode frequency is the best-calibrated method among those tested (ECE 5.7% vs. 25.5% for the answer-word log-probability on Qwen3-8B; 10.3% vs. 13.1% on Qwen3.6-27B), and that the log-prob baseline can serve as a fast triage signal at a fraction of the cost. Code and the patched trainer are available at https://github.com/federicotorrielli/probabilistic_activation_oracles.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncertainty Estimation | Secret-word taboo dataset (random-split) | Accuracy41.8 | 32 | |
| secret-word task | secret-word task | Accuracy41.8 | 20 |