Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Agile Online Model Selection: Resolving Adaptation Lag via Safeguarded Large Learning Rates

About

Maintaining predictive accuracy in non-stationary environments requires online model selection to adapt autonomously to unknown distribution shifts. However, existing tuning-free algorithms face a fundamental trade-off between robustness and agility. Specifically, to ensure dynamic regret bounds, they must restrict learning rates to small constants (e.g., $O(1)$). This restriction inevitably causes significant adaptation lag during abrupt changes. To resolve this, we propose a novel optimistic online mirror descent that utilizes safeguarded large learning rates up to $\Theta(T)$, where $T$ is the number of rounds. Our key technical contribution is a post-hoc penalty mechanism that dynamically monitors unstable updates and excludes learning rates incurring excessive regret, eliminating the need for restrictive a priori constraints. We show that the cumulative penalty remains $O(\log T)$, allowing our algorithm to match near-optimal worst-case guarantees while achieving superior rates in benign cases. Empirical evaluations on three synthetic and eleven diverse real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach reduces the adaptation lag from hundreds of rounds to a few rounds, consistently outperforming tuning-free baselines.

Kei Takemura, Ryuta Matsuno, Keita Sakuma• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Online Model SelectionRotated MNIST Abrupt Drift
Cumulative Loss44.48
10
ClassificationForest (test)
Normalized Cumulative Loss53.94
5
ClassificationHuffPost (test)
Normalized Cumulative Loss77.08
5
ClassificationRialto (test)
Normalized Cumulative Loss61.62
5
ClassificationWeather (test)
Normalized Cumulative Loss93.19
5
Online Model SelectionRotated MNIST Incremental Drift
Cumulative Loss42.97
5
Regressionbikesharing (test)
Normalized Cumulative Loss58.17
5
RegressionTemperature (test)
Normalized Cumulative Loss75.77
5
ClassificationarXiv (test)
Normalized Cumulative Loss92.55
5
ClassificationAirlines (test)
Normalized Cumulative Loss88.24
5
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update