GraphReview: Scientific Paper Evaluation via LLM-Based Graph Message Passing
About
Scientific paper evaluation often involves not only assessing a manuscript itself, but also relating it to contemporaneous research and prior literature. However, existing LLM-based methods typically model these signals separately and lack a unified mechanism for propagating review evidence across papers. We propose $\textbf{GraphReview}$, a graph-based LLM framework that formulates paper evaluation as review-signal message passing over a semantic paper graph. The graph jointly captures intrinsic quality, synchronic links among contemporaneous papers, and diachronic links to prior work. LLMs are used to estimate node-level quality priors and generate edge-level comparative evidence through pairwise paper comparisons, while Personalized PageRank integrates review signals for quality ranking, decision prediction, and review generation. To produce higher-quality graph evidence, we propose reward-induced maximum likelihood objectives for training the LLM backbones. Experiments show that GraphReview consistently outperforms the strongest baseline, achieving average improvements of 29.7% on decision and ranking metrics, including gains of 23.7% in Accuracy and 57.6% in Spearman's $\rho$. It also produces higher-quality review texts and generalizes effectively across time periods and conference venues. The code is available at https://github.com/ECNU-Text-Computing/GraphReview.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper Quality Evaluation | ICLR 2025 (test) | Kendall Tau Correlation48.08 | 32 | |
| Paper Acceptance Decision | ICLR submissions 2025 | Accuracy89.8 | 17 | |
| Review Quality Evaluation | Scientific Papers 200 sampled papers (random sample) | Technical Depth100 | 6 | |
| Binary decision | Paper Review Benchmark | Accuracy89.8 | 5 | |
| Ranking | Paper Review Benchmark | Spearman Correlation0.6626 | 5 |