Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Bilinear Coordinate Alignment for Training-Free Task-Vector Transfer

About

Fine-tuning large-scale pre-trained models is a recent prevalent paradigm for adapting general representations to specialized tasks. However, when a new version of a pre-trained model becomes available, expertise acquired through fine-tuning cannot be directly reused because it is tied to the parameterization of the original model, requiring another costly fine-tuning. To address this inefficiency, recent work uses task vectors, defined as the parameter difference between a fine-tuned model and its base model, to transfer expertise across models. While existing methods bridge disparate models by matching activations or gradients, a significant performance gap remains relative to direct fine-tuning, suggesting that these partial correspondences are insufficient. In this work, instead of viewing a task vector merely as a parameter offset, we revisit the formation of task vectors and show that they can be derived as accumulated bilinear interactions between input-side activations and output-side gradients. Motivated by this observation, we formulate task-vector transfer as a dual-space alignment problem and propose BiCo, a training-free framework for transferring task vectors through Bilinear Coordinate alignment. BiCo estimates orthogonal Procrustes mappings in both spaces using a single forward-backward pass on a small calibration set, without any parameter update. Across extensive computer vision and natural language processing benchmarks, BiCo consistently outperforms existing transfer methods across models that differ in width, depth, and pre-training configuration.

Jungyong Son, Jinwook Jung, Minhee Park, Sungyong Baik• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
ClassificationCars
Accuracy88.33
492
Image ClassificationRESISC45
Accuracy78.05
472
Image Classification8-task vision benchmark
Average Accuracy83.18
193
Image ClassificationSVHN
Top-1 Accuracy83.4
186
Image ClassificationSUN397
Accuracy74.74
116
Image ClassificationSUN397, Cars, RESISC45, EuroSAT, SVHN, GTSRB, MNIST, DTD (test)
Avg Acc82.99
114
Image ClassificationStanford Cars
Top-1 Accuracy93.79
104
Image ClassificationGTSRB
Accuracy82.53
81
Image ClassificationDTD
Accuracy71.54
75
Image ClassificationSVHN
ACC (Accuracy)73.28
58
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update