Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

GDSD: Reinforcement Learning as Guided Denoiser Self-Distillation for Diffusion Language Models

About

Reinforcement learning (RL) can be used to improve the policy (denoiser) of diffusion large language models (dLLMs), while being hindered by the intractability of the policy likelihood. A dominant and efficient family of methods replaces the likelihood in standard RL with its evidence lower bound (ELBO), estimated from randomly masked sequences. Despite being well aligned with pre-training, these approaches introduce bias through training--inference mismatch by using the ELBO as a likelihood surrogate, which can degrade performance. In this work, we propose Guided Denoiser Self-Distillation (GDSD) to directly distill the denoiser of dLLMs from an advantage-guided self-teacher, derived from the closed-form optimum of reverse-KL regularized RL. GDSD matches the dLLM's denoiser logits to the teacher's via a normalization-free objective, which reduces RL to likelihood-free self-distillation and thus bypasses the TIM biases. Recent ELBO-based methods emerge as instances of applying different distillation divergences, but with diagnosable pathologies that GDSD avoids. On planning, math, and coding benchmarks with LLaDA-8B and Dream-7B, GDSD consistently outperforms prior state-of-the-art ELBO-based methods with a more stable training reward dynamics, achieving test-accuracy improvements of up to $+19.6\%$. These results suggest that direct denoiser self-distillation, without relying on an ELBO likelihood surrogate, can provide a more stable and effective RL procedure for dLLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/GaryBall/GDSD.

Xiaohang Tang, Keyue Jiang, Che Liu, Qifang Zhao, Xiaoxiao Xu, Sangwoong Yoon, Ilija Bogunovic• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Code GenerationHumanEval+--
393
PlanningSudoku
Accuracy92
129
Code GenerationHumanEval+
Pass@141.5
61
Code GenerationMBPP (3)
Pass@143.6
28
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K
Accuracy86.4
27
PlanningCountdown
Accuracy85.6
27
Code GenerationMBPP
Accuracy43.6
27
Logical planningSudoku (test)
Accuracy91.7
24
Logical planningCOUNTDOWN (test)
Accuracy84.8
24
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update