OccamToken: Efficient VLM Inference with Training-Free and Budget-Adaptive Token Pruning
About
Vision-language models (VLMs) rely on long visual token sequences for visual understanding, making the prefill stage expensive in both computation and memory. Most existing pruning methods follow an absolute-ranking paradigm, assigning importance scores to visual tokens and retaining a fixed top-K subset. In this work, we argue that this paradigm is fundamentally brittle: attention sinks distort token importance rankings, while image redundancy and query-dependent visual evidence make fixed token budgets unreliable across inputs. We propose OccamToken, a training-free framework that replaces absolute token ranking with register-anchored relative evidence testing. Instead of asking which tokens are globally important, OccamToken evaluates whether a visual token provides information beyond a register-based reference. Our key insight is that register tokens naturally absorb low-information attention patterns, making them a stable reference for identifying genuinely informative visual evidence. Based on this principle, OccamToken performs both image-adaptive redundancy pruning and query-adaptive relevance pruning through dynamic thresholds derived from register attention. Across LLaVA-NeXT, LLaVA-v1.5, and Qwen3-VL, OccamToken consistently improves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off without additional training. Notably, on LLaVA-NeXT, it reduces 2,880 visual tokens to approximately 40 while preserving over 93% of the original accuracy, enabling stable visual token compression even in the extreme 1.4% retention regime.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Hallucination Evaluation | POPE | Accuracy86.8 | 2019 | |
| Visual Question Answering | VQA v2 | Accuracy80 | 1429 | |
| Multimodal Understanding | MMBench | Accuracy77.1 | 847 | |
| Science Question Answering | ScienceQA | Accuracy81.4 | 791 | |
| Multimodal Evaluation | MME | Score2.16e+3 | 727 | |
| Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding | MMMU | Accuracy47.7 | 363 | |
| Multimodal Understanding | MMBench (MMB) | Accuracy66.2 | 166 | |
| Multimodal Understanding | SEED-Bench Image | Accuracy74.1 | 143 | |
| Science Question Answering | ScienceQA SQA-I | Accuracy68.7 | 122 | |
| Multimodal Evaluation | MMBench | -- | 118 |