Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Neural Operator-Based Surrogate Model for CFD:Helical Coil Steam Generator in Small Modular Reactor

About

Real-time thermal-hydraulic simulation is essential for digital twin (DT) technology that supports the safe and efficient operation of small modular reactors (SMRs). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) provides high-fidelity flow analysis, but its computational cost prevents direct use in DT applications. AI-based surrogate modeling has been actively investigated to address this limitation, yet neural operator--based surrogates for CFD-level transient analysis of SMR-specific geometries have not been reported. This study presents an integrated framework that combines a reduced-order model (ROM) with neural operators, applied to the helical coil steam generator (HCSG) of the System-integrated Modular Advanced Reactor (SMART). Two ROM strategies tailored to each CFD data type were compared, an MLP-based autoencoder (AE) for unstructured mesh data and a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) for structured mesh data, and each was coupled with the deep operator network (DeepONet) to construct the latent DeepONet (L-DeepONet). The Fourier neural operator (FNO) was additionally adopted for comparison. A multi-scale technique was incorporated into both frameworks to mitigate spectral bias and improve the prediction of K\'{a}rm\'{a}n vortex streets developing inside the HCSG. The multi-scale L-DeepONet captured the instantaneous periodic vortex dynamics in both velocity and pressure fields, while the FNO and its multi-scale variant predicted the time-averaged mean flow and provided reliable pressure drop estimates. These complementary characteristics provide a practical model-selection guideline that links each architecture to specific DT objectives based on CFD data type and the required level of flow resolution.

Minseo Lee, Seongmin Oh, Chaehyeon Song, Bumjin Cho, Shilaj Baral, Sangam Khanal, Minseop Song, Joongoo Jeon• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Flow Field PredictionHCSG tube bundle 0.4 m/s inlet velocity (test)
Point-wise Metric P14.765
4
Fluid Flow PredictionHCSG tube bundle inlet velocity 0.7 m/s
Error P15.71
4
Pressure drop predictionPressure Drop Prediction Dataset Inlet 0.7 m/s
Mean Relative Error1.92
4
Pressure drop predictionPressure Drop Prediction Dataset (Inlet 0.4 m/s)
Mean Relative Error1.24
4
Pressure field predictionHCSG Inlet 0.7 m/s (test)
Mean Relative L2 Error18.19
4
Pressure field predictionHCSG Inlet 0.4 m/s (test)
Mean Relative L2 Error14.5
4
Velocity field predictionHCSG Inlet 0.4 m/s (test)
Mean Relative L2 Error8.31
4
Velocity field predictionHCSG Inlet 0.7 m/s (test)
Mean Relative L2 Error0.1172
4
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update