EvoRubric: Self-Evolving Rubric-Driven RL for Open-Ended Generation
About
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has significantly advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) in verifiable domains, but aligning models for open-ended generation remains profoundly challenging due to the lack of definitive rewards. Current rubric-based RL methods mitigate this by employing explicit criteria; however, they rely heavily on static, human-annotated rubrics that inevitably cause policy lag, or expensive external proprietary models for dynamic updates. In this paper, we propose EvoRubric, a novel single-policy co-evolutionary RL framework that eliminates the reliance on static criteria and on external rubric generators. By unifying response generation and rubric generation under a single parameterized policy, EvoRubric dynamically alternates between a Reasoner and a Rubric Generator. To prevent reward hacking and ensure the reliability of generated signals, we introduce a multi-level verification pipeline featuring a meta-verifier, zero-variance pruning, and a Leave-One-Out peer consensus mechanism. Validated criteria are dynamically archived into a memory pool, yielding dense, multi-objective rewards to continuously co-optimize both roles. Extensive experiments across Medical, Writing, and Science domains demonstrate that EvoRubric consistently outperforms traditional static and external-LLM-driven alignment methods. Notably, our framework is compatible with human-expert priors. When initialized with expert-annotated rubrics, EvoRubric can further uncover novel, discriminative dimensions, achieving better performance than relying solely on static expert annotations.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open-ended writing | WritingBench | Score75.76 | 20 | |
| Medical Question Answering | HealthBench Medical | Score56.36 | 10 | |
| Multi-domain evaluation | Aggregate HealthBench, LLMMed-Eval, WritingBench, Creative Writing, ResearchQA | Macro-average Score70.55 | 10 | |
| Science Question Answering | ResearchQA Science | Score77.31 | 10 | |
| Creative Writing Generation | Creative Writing | Score69.88 | 10 | |
| Medical Question Answering | LLMMed-Eval Medical | Score73.46 | 10 |