SLAT: Segment-Level Adaptive Trimming for Efficient CoT Reasoning
About
Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models have significantly improved chain-of-thought (CoT) capabilities via reinforcement learning (RL). However, generated reasoning chains frequently suffer from structural redundancy (i.e., \emph{overthinking}), incurring high computational overhead without improving answer correctness. Existing mitigation strategies typically rely on token-uniform length penalties, which provide coarse, segment-agnostic pressure toward shorter outputs and can inadvertently suppress useful reasoning alongside redundancy. To address this, we demonstrate that inefficiency concentrates in high-probability segments with low marginal utility. We derive a theoretical characterization of segment suboptimality under the correctness-length trade-off objective and propose \textsc{SLAT} (Segment-Level Adaptive Trimming), an RL framework that selectively suppresses redundant segments based on this criterion. Empirical results on standard benchmarks indicate that \textsc{SLAT} establishes a superior accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier, reducing reasoning length by $50\%$ relative to uncompressed baselines while maintaining competitive accuracy. Overall, our results suggest that theoretically grounded, segment-aware trimming is a promising direction for efficient CoT reasoning in large language models.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Reasoning | MATH 500 | Accuracy92.8 | 589 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | Olympiad Bench | Accuracy59.6 | 254 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AIME 24 | Accuracy45 | 78 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AIME24 | Accuracy52.9 | 70 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AIME 25 | Accuracy31.6 | 48 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AMC23 | Accuracy89.1 | 41 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | MATH 500 | Accuracy86.2 | 18 | |
| Language Understanding | MMLU | Accuracy58.3 | 6 | |
| Science Question Answering | GPQA | Accuracy50.6 | 6 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | Mathematical Reasonings Average | Accuracy60.6 | 3 |