OmniOPD: Logit-Free On-Policy Distillation via Speculative Verification
About
On-Policy Distillation (OPD) trains a student model on its own generative trajectories under dense token-level feedback from a stronger teacher, mitigating both the off-policy distribution shift of Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and the sparse credit assignment of Reinforcement Learning (RL). However, standard OPD faces two coupled limitations. First, it requires direct access to the teacher's token-level logits, excluding a broad class of capable proprietary models from serving as teachers. Second, the token-level logit signal itself is brittle, depending on a narrow overlap of plausible next tokens between teacher and student, and prone to amplifying degenerate patterns such as repetition loops. In this paper, we introduce OmniOPD, a novel framework that addresses both limitations through a logit-free, chunk-level supervision signal. OmniOPD replaces deterministic logit matching with Monte Carlo rollouts that approximate the teacher's local preferences through a continuous semantic similarity metric over multi-token chunks, and concentrates this supervision via a peak-entropy scheduler that audits the student only at its high-uncertainty reasoning forks. A Dirichlet-Multinomial Bayesian prior and a base-model KL anchor further bound the variance of discrete sampling and prevent policy collapse across unaudited tokens. Across competitive benchmarks, OmniOPD surpasses the standard OPD approach by up to +28.64% on math, confirming that chunk-level semantic verification extracts a more reliable learning signal than token-level logit matching, whose high information density is offset by significant noise and brittleness. Furthermore, when paired with stronger black-box teachers such as Claude-4.5-Haiku and Gemini-2.5-Flash, OmniOPD achieves an additional +9.54% relative on math over its open-weight teacher counterpart, advancing the student past the performance of self-exploratory RL.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Reasoning | AIME 2024 | Pass@1 Accuracy75 | 236 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | MATH 500 | Pass@1 Rate84.61 | 236 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AIME 2025 | Pass@1 Accuracy65.63 | 192 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | Mathematical Reasoning Suite MATH 500, AIME 2024, AIME 2025, AMC 2023, Olympiad Bench | Average Score75.67 | 29 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AMC 23 | Pass@1 Accuracy93.44 | 27 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | OlympiadBench | Pass@1 Accuracy64.58 | 21 | |
| Competitive Programming | APPS (val) | Pass@171.72 | 6 | |
| Competitive Programming | CodeContests (val) | Pass@168.52 | 6 | |
| Competitive Programming | Codeforces (val) | Pass@170.49 | 6 | |
| Competitive Programming | TACO (val) | Pass@144.37 | 6 |