Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

GJDNet: Robust Graph Neural Networks via Joint Disentangled Learning Against Adversarial Attacks

About

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which inherently invert connectivity patterns by introducing disassortative edges in assortative graphs and assortative edges in disassortative graphs. This structural inversion creates structure-feature mismatches that disrupt neighborhood aggregation across different graph types. However, we find that existing defenses are limited, as they either treat neighborhoods as monolithic under fixed assortativity assumptions or rely on standard softmax classifiers that fail to account for perturbation-induced representation shifts. To further exploit this observation, we adopt a robustness perspective that jointly disentangles node representations and decision spaces, isolating perturbation effects while enforcing well-separated decision regions. Based on this principle, we propose Graph Joint Disentanglement Network (GJDNet), a unified framework for robust node classification across diverse graph assortativity regimes. GJDNet enhances robustness at both representation and decision levels: it employs feature-driven soft structural disentanglement with skewness-aware neighbor filtering to suppress perturbation-induced structure-feature mismatches, and introduces a Spherical Decision Boundary (SDB) to promote intra-class compactness and inter-class separation in the embedding space, thereby stabilizing decision boundaries under perturbations. Theoretical analysis provides insights into the effectiveness of the proposed disentangled representation and decision mechanisms, while extensive experiments demonstrate that GJDNet consistently achieves strong robustness across graphs with different connectivity regimes.

Canyixing Cui, Tao Wu, Xingping Xian, Xiao-Ke Xu, Mao Wang, Weina Niu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy61.38
864
Node ClassificationCornell
Accuracy55.04
851
Node ClassificationTexas
Accuracy0.6667
801
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy85.64
583
Node ClassificationActor
Accuracy33.37
556
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy88.24
363
Node ClassificationAmazon Photo
Accuracy96.38
313
Node ClassificationCiteseer
Mean Accuracy76.51
202
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update