Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Pave-GRPO: Beyond Instantaneous Guidance through Principled Average Velocity Decomposition

About

Post-training via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for aligning flow-based generative models with human preferences. However, the iterative denoising nature of flow models incurs substantial costs when generating group rollouts for policy-gradient updates, compelling existing methods to train with extremely few denoising steps. This temporal sparsity severely restricts preference optimization: reward feedback can only reach a handful of stages per trajectory, leaving the vast majority of intermediate denoising steps without direct supervision and thus compromising alignment granularity. To address this, we propose Pave-GRPO, which reformulates the GRPO objective through Principled average velocity decomposition. Rather than generating expensive high-step rollouts, we maintain efficient few-step group sampling but decompose each coarse transition into an equivalent ensemble of finer sub-trajectories spanning multiple intermediate timesteps. This propagates reward feedback to a denser set of temporal stages for more comprehensive preference alignment without additional generation cost. This design offers two benefits: (i) zero-cost horizon expansion: through the direct reuse of piece-wise group samples and their associated rewards, Pave-GRPO significantly broadens the effective optimization scope under fixed sampling budgets; and (ii) comprehensive temporal supervision: by equivalently decomposing an instantaneous velocity target into a multi-timestep ensemble, it distributes reward signals across more intermediate stages of the denoising process, enabling finer-grained and more thorough preference optimization. Extensive experiments validate that Pave-GRPO effectively advances preference alignment across different reward settings, offering comprehensive performance enhancement.

Pengyang Ling, Jiazi Bu, Yujie Zhou, Yibin Wang, Zhenyu Hu, Zihan Zhang, Yi Jin, Huaian Chen, Yuhang Zang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Text-to-Image GenerationUniGenBench 600 prompts (test)
HPS-v2 Score36.4
21
Text-to-Image GenerationUniGenBench
Style Score86.4
17
Showing 2 of 2 rows

Other info

Follow for update