From Extrinsic to Intrinsic: Geodesic-Guided Representation Learning for 3D Geometric Data
About
Geometric analysis fundamentally distinguishes between \textit{extrinsic} and \textit{intrinsic} perspectives. The dominant paradigm in current 3D representation learning relies on either extrinsic spatial structures or high-level semantics, struggling to capture the essence of shape identity and underlying manifold topology. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel 3D representation learning paradigm, namely \textbf{PRISM}, for \textbf{P}re-training, which learns isometric embeddings by \textbf{R}ecovering the \textbf{I}ntrinsic \textbf{S}urface geodesic \textbf{M}etric. PRISM incorporates a topology-enforcing objective that explicitly constrains the structure of latent space, alongside a specialized two-stage training recipe mitigating sample imbalance inherent in the distribution of geodesic distances. Experiments demonstrate that our approach shows satisfactory accuracy, robustness, and high efficiency in geodesic distance prediction and achieves superior performance across diverse downstream tasks, including shape recognition, surface parameterization, and non-rigid correspondence. The code will be publicly available at https://github.com/AidenZhao/PRISM.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part Segmentation | ShapeNetPart (test) | -- | 347 | |
| 3D Object Classification | ScanObjectNN PB_T50_RS | OA89.9 | 94 | |
| 3D Object Classification | ScanObjectNN OBJ_ONLY | Overall Accuracy92.7 | 83 | |
| 3D Classification | ScanObjectNN OBJ-BG | Top-1 Acc93.9 | 42 | |
| 3D shape matching | FAUST (test) | Geodesic Error (E)1.4 | 11 | |
| Geodesic Distance Prediction | ShapeNet refined subset (test) | MRE (%)3.87 | 11 | |
| 3D Object Classification | ScanObjectNN PB-T50-RS (test) | Accuracy72.1 | 7 | |
| Fixed-Boundary Surface Parameterization | 3D geometric data | Error5.34 | 3 |